Solutions journalism: how we engage, inspire and create change

The Lovepost represents our belief that love is not just a sentiment but a force for substantial change. By focusing on well-researched, solution-oriented journalism, we demonstrate how love can inspire real-world transformations and drive positive progress.

Always solution-focused

We focus on reporting stories that go beyond highlighting problems to explore potential solutions and responses. However, we believe that before any solution can be deemed valid, a thorough analysis of the problem is essential. This ensures that proposed solutions have practical impact and proven effectiveness, while also acknowledging the inherent challenges and complexities. We do not endorse the notion of a silver bullet; any solution presented as a foolproof fix is likely to be oversimplified and misinformed. True solutions require thoughtful consideration and a comprehensive approach.

We explore the impact of solutions and their potential for replication or adaptation in different contexts. We look for stories that showcase innovative approaches, successful initiatives and positive change happening in communities.

Shifting the narrative: from neutrality to justice

The concept of “unbiased reporting” is not a universal truth but a construct embedded in systems of power, privilege and cultural dominance. Far from being neutral, it has historically served as a political tool that reinforces White-centric perspectives and marginalises diverse voices. Movements for racial justice, Indigenous sovereignty and decolonisation are often labeled as “biased” or “radical” because they challenge White-centric power structures. By framing these movements as subjective or unbalanced, the media delegitimises their calls for equity and justice while protecting the status quo. For this reason, we focus on justice-oriented reporting over the pursuit of neutrality for neutrality’s sake. Rather than asking whether a view is biased or unbiased, we ask:

  • Does this perspective uphold or undermine human dignity and rights?
  • Is it grounded in factual accuracy and ethical integrity?
  • Does it address power dynamics and structural inequities?

By centring these questions, we shift the focus from detached neutrality to storytelling that seeks truth, amplifies underrepresented voices and advances justice.

Acknowledging historical and systemic contexts

Understanding the broader context of the issues we cover is crucial. We recognise that historical and systemic inequalities, including those based on race, gender and socioeconomic status, have shaped the world we live in today. Addressing these facts is not about assigning blame but about recognising the realities that influence current challenges and potential solutions. Human rights are fundamental and should not be up for debate. Our commitment is to present these facts with clarity and integrity.

We live in a highly polarised world where differing perspectives can create significant divides. Our goal is to bridge these divides by creating understanding and dialogue. We believe that open, honest conversations about systemic issues are essential for progress.

We try to avoid sensationalism

We prioritise integrity and authenticity in our content by consciously avoiding sensational language. Our commitment to this principle comes from the belief that truthful and balanced reporting creates trust and encourages informed engagement. Sensationalism often distorts facts and exploits emotions, leading to misrepresentation and misinterpretation of the issues at hand.

We prioritise accessibility

We write in clear, concise language that is easy for a general audience to understand. We try to avoid jargon, technical terms and complex language that may alienate readers. We use storytelling techniques and real-life examples to make complex issues relatable and engaging.

We highlight diverse perspectives

We ensure that stories represent a diverse range of voices, perspectives and experiences. We amplify voices from marginalised communities, including those most affected by the issues being reported on.

All stories are well-researched and fact-checked

We conduct thorough research using reliable sources to gather accurate information. We fact-check all information and verify the credibility of sources before publishing. We always provide citations or links to sources to support the information presented in the article.

We collaborate with experts and communities

We engage with carefully selected experts and community members who are actively involved in addressing the issues being reported on. By critically evaluating and cross-referencing the knowledge of these experts, we ensure that our reporting is accurate, informed and credible. This thorough approach is essential in preventing the spread of misinformation, helping us present the most reliable information available. Our process for selecting these voices includes:

  • Credentials and experience
    We select individuals with expertise drawn from academic backgrounds, professional practice or Indigenous knowledge systems.
  • Diverse knowledge systems
    We value peer-reviewed research alongside the rich, community-validated knowledge held by Indigenous and other marginalised peoples, both of which are essential for a holistic understanding of societal issues.
  • Reputation and integrity
    We evaluate the reputation and integrity of all contributors, considering their public contributions, ethical standards and the respect they hold within their fields or communities.
  • Validation and cross-referencing
    We cross-reference information with other sources and seek validation within communities, recognising both traditional knowledge and lived experiences as important components of our understanding.
We maintain ethical standards

We uphold principles of journalistic integrity, including accuracy, fairness and transparency. We encourage critical thinking and scepticism by providing comprehensive context and analysis. We respect the privacy and dignity of individuals featured in stories, seeking their consent when appropriate. We disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may influence reporting.

We encourage action

We invite readers to participate by including actionable steps or suggestions for how readers can get involved or support the issue being reported on.

Leadership and team members reflecting our values

At the core of our values is a commitment to building a team that reflects the intersectionality of our society. Our team is made up of people with disabilities, neurodivergent individuals, and those from a wide range of cultural, ethnic, gender, sexual, religious and generational backgrounds.

Their lived experiences and perspectives enrich our work and drive our commitment to inclusivity. This diversity within our organisation ensures that we approach our reporting and initiatives with a deep understanding and genuine dedication to the issues we cover.

Acknowledgment of original custodians

We acknowledge the original custodians of the lands on which we operate and report. Recognising the enduring connection of Indigenous peoples to their lands is an essential part of our commitment to truth and reconciliation. This acknowledgment is coupled with actionable steps to support Indigenous communities, including:

  • A commitment to educating our audience about the history and ongoing impacts of colonisation and systemic inequalities faced by Indigenous peoples.
  • A dedication to ongoing learning about Indigenous cultures, histories and issues. We also strive to integrate this knowledge into our work in meaningful ways.

Editor's note

Please note that we also feature sections dedicated to creative writing and satire, which serve different purposes. The content in these sections is intended for entertainment and artistic expression and does not necessarily adhere to the same standards as our journalistic content. By clearly distinguishing between these types of content, we aim to provide a diverse and engaging experience for our readers while maintaining the integrity and trustworthiness of our journalistic work.